<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Poshoholic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poshoholic.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://poshoholic.com</link>
	<description>Totally addicted to PowerShell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:17:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerWF and PowerSE 2.7 are now available by Episode 174 &#8211; Matt Graeber using PowerShell in Infosec &#171; PowerScripting Podcast</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/24/powerwf-and-powerse-2-7-are-now-available/#comment-2812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Episode 174 &#8211; Matt Graeber using PowerShell in Infosec &#171; PowerScripting Podcast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=747#comment-2812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Version 2.7 of PowerWF and PowerSE are now available [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Version 2.7 of PowerWF and PowerSE are now available [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerSE 2.7 KB: PowerShell profile does not load on startup by jkavanagh58</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/25/powerse-2-7-kb-powershell-profile-does-not-load-on-startup/#comment-2806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkavanagh58]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=750#comment-2806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent, thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerWF and PowerSE 2.7 are now available by PowerShell Magazine</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/24/powerwf-and-powerse-2-7-are-now-available/#comment-2802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PowerShell Magazine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=747#comment-2802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] PowerWF and PowerSE 2.7 were released to the web and they can now be downloaded from HERE. Share this:ShareEmailFacebookPrintDigg    Filed in: News [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PowerWF and PowerSE 2.7 were released to the web and they can now be downloaded from HERE. Share this:ShareEmailFacebookPrintDigg    Filed in: News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Essential PowerShell: To alias, or not to alias, that is the question by Kirk Munro</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/05/essential-powershell-to-alias-or-not-to-alias-that-is-the-question/#comment-2777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirk Munro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=738#comment-2777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Rafael,

I agree with supporting a familiar vocabulary using aliases, however I probably wouldn&#039;t create them with a cmdlet-like &quot;verb-noun&quot; name format because I&#039;d be afraid users would use those aliases in published and shared scripts and not just in ad-hoc work.  In this specific case, I think the consistency provided through a small library of verbs which benefits the entire PowerShell community outweighs the benefits you&#039;d be providing to scripters by using aliases to add verb substitutes for domain vocabulary familiarity.  Learning that PowerShell has only a finite set of verbs and figuring out how to make intelligent guesses using synonyms once you learn some of those verbs is only a small hurdle to overcome.  Otherwise, if one team uses Hold as an alias verb for Suspend and another uses Pause, and yet another uses Delay, or Retain, or something else, then we lose the benefits that a small set of verbs provides.  Besides, there really is no notion of verbs in aliases as far as command metadata is concerned, so users wouldn&#039;t be able to invoke Get-Command -Verb Hold to discover your alias commands, which could cause further confusion.

Even though I say all that though, I think aliases are great at retaining domain knowledge.  Maybe not so much in the verb-noun format though.  But I&#039;m always open to discussion to see what possibilities do come out of it, and this is only my opinion on this issue.  Food for thought anyway.

Kirk out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rafael,</p>
<p>I agree with supporting a familiar vocabulary using aliases, however I probably wouldn&#8217;t create them with a cmdlet-like &#8220;verb-noun&#8221; name format because I&#8217;d be afraid users would use those aliases in published and shared scripts and not just in ad-hoc work.  In this specific case, I think the consistency provided through a small library of verbs which benefits the entire PowerShell community outweighs the benefits you&#8217;d be providing to scripters by using aliases to add verb substitutes for domain vocabulary familiarity.  Learning that PowerShell has only a finite set of verbs and figuring out how to make intelligent guesses using synonyms once you learn some of those verbs is only a small hurdle to overcome.  Otherwise, if one team uses Hold as an alias verb for Suspend and another uses Pause, and yet another uses Delay, or Retain, or something else, then we lose the benefits that a small set of verbs provides.  Besides, there really is no notion of verbs in aliases as far as command metadata is concerned, so users wouldn&#8217;t be able to invoke Get-Command -Verb Hold to discover your alias commands, which could cause further confusion.</p>
<p>Even though I say all that though, I think aliases are great at retaining domain knowledge.  Maybe not so much in the verb-noun format though.  But I&#8217;m always open to discussion to see what possibilities do come out of it, and this is only my opinion on this issue.  Food for thought anyway.</p>
<p>Kirk out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Essential PowerShell: To alias, or not to alias, that is the question by Rafael Goodman</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/05/essential-powershell-to-alias-or-not-to-alias-that-is-the-question/#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafael Goodman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=738#comment-2776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t recall where I read it, but as an ISV module developer, it&#039;s helpful to provide aliases for cmdlets in order to reconcile the terminology of the product being exposed via the module with PowerShell&#039;s prescriptive verbs. If the aliases conform to the same recommended convention for cmdlet names (i.e. -), it decreases the likelihood of name clashes. 

For example, say a product&#039;s users are accustomed to the notion of &quot;holding&quot; a job. &quot;Hold&quot; isn&#039;t one of the PowerShell standard verbs, but &quot;suspend&quot; is. 

In order to reconcile this, assuming the two-letter product abbreviation is &quot;BE&quot;, the ISV could export a cmdlet called Suspend-BEJob and an alias to the cmdlet called Hold-BEJob. 

The result is that users benefit from the consistency and usability of both the PowerShell verbs AND product-specific terminology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t recall where I read it, but as an ISV module developer, it&#8217;s helpful to provide aliases for cmdlets in order to reconcile the terminology of the product being exposed via the module with PowerShell&#8217;s prescriptive verbs. If the aliases conform to the same recommended convention for cmdlet names (i.e. -), it decreases the likelihood of name clashes. </p>
<p>For example, say a product&#8217;s users are accustomed to the notion of &#8220;holding&#8221; a job. &#8220;Hold&#8221; isn&#8217;t one of the PowerShell standard verbs, but &#8220;suspend&#8221; is. </p>
<p>In order to reconcile this, assuming the two-letter product abbreviation is &#8220;BE&#8221;, the ISV could export a cmdlet called Suspend-BEJob and an alias to the cmdlet called Hold-BEJob. </p>
<p>The result is that users benefit from the consistency and usability of both the PowerShell verbs AND product-specific terminology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerShell Deep Dive: Using $MyInvocation and Invoke-Expression to support dot-sourcing and direct invocation in shared PowerShell scripts by Determine Pipeline Input &#171; The Tech Cafe..</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2008/03/18/powershell-deep-dive-using-myinvocation-and-invoke-expression-to-support-dot-sourcing-and-direct-invocation-in-shared-powershell-scripts/#comment-2772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Determine Pipeline Input &#171; The Tech Cafe..]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 21:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-2772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] upon doing a google search I came across the following article PowerShell Deep Dive: Using $MyInvocation by Kirk Munro which went into great detail on how to use the $MyInvocation variable to make a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] upon doing a google search I came across the following article PowerShell Deep Dive: Using $MyInvocation by Kirk Munro which went into great detail on how to use the $MyInvocation variable to make a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Essential PowerShell: To alias, or not to alias, that is the question by Mark E. Schill</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/05/essential-powershell-to-alias-or-not-to-alias-that-is-the-question/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark E. Schill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=738#comment-2769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won&#039;t argue with you there. I will give the PowerShell team great leeway in this because this is the base system and these are aliases for the core. I don&#039;t think that other vendors or product teams within Microsoft should be creating aliases. They can recommend aliases all they want, just don&#039;t create them as part as their product.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t argue with you there. I will give the PowerShell team great leeway in this because this is the base system and these are aliases for the core. I don&#8217;t think that other vendors or product teams within Microsoft should be creating aliases. They can recommend aliases all they want, just don&#8217;t create them as part as their product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Essential PowerShell: To alias, or not to alias, that is the question by Kirk Munro</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/05/essential-powershell-to-alias-or-not-to-alias-that-is-the-question/#comment-2768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirk Munro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=738#comment-2768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that aliases should never show up in published scripts or examples.  I don&#039;t agree that vendors shouldn&#039;t create aliases at all though.  I would state it differently: that vendors should only include aliases when existing knowledge of a shorthand command vocabulary makes it extremely advantageous, or when the frequency that commands are used warrants it.  For the former, examples in core PowerShell commands are abundant: dir, cd, mkdir, etc.  For the latter, there are some good examples that are used quite frequently (and therefore are big time savers).

Consider imo/rmo for Import-/Remove-Module...those two save me personally a ton of time (they&#039;re much less important in PowerShell v3 though).  Or consider common ones like gsv (Get-Service), gps (Get-Process), or the breakpoint aliases: gbp, sbp, rbp, all very useful when defining command or variable breakpoints.  They&#039;re also useful for line breakpoints, but less since modern scripting environments make line breakpoints easy.  If these aliases weren&#039;t defined by default, I&#039;d have to be diligent and organized enough to set up a profile, or a USB key if I work with multiple machines, plus consider RDP scenarios where a USB key wouldn&#039;t be helpful.  With those challenges in mind, I&#039;m all for having some aliases defined by default...I just think module authors need to take it easy and stick to the most useful and most frequent commands for this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that aliases should never show up in published scripts or examples.  I don&#8217;t agree that vendors shouldn&#8217;t create aliases at all though.  I would state it differently: that vendors should only include aliases when existing knowledge of a shorthand command vocabulary makes it extremely advantageous, or when the frequency that commands are used warrants it.  For the former, examples in core PowerShell commands are abundant: dir, cd, mkdir, etc.  For the latter, there are some good examples that are used quite frequently (and therefore are big time savers).</p>
<p>Consider imo/rmo for Import-/Remove-Module&#8230;those two save me personally a ton of time (they&#8217;re much less important in PowerShell v3 though).  Or consider common ones like gsv (Get-Service), gps (Get-Process), or the breakpoint aliases: gbp, sbp, rbp, all very useful when defining command or variable breakpoints.  They&#8217;re also useful for line breakpoints, but less since modern scripting environments make line breakpoints easy.  If these aliases weren&#8217;t defined by default, I&#8217;d have to be diligent and organized enough to set up a profile, or a USB key if I work with multiple machines, plus consider RDP scenarios where a USB key wouldn&#8217;t be helpful.  With those challenges in mind, I&#8217;m all for having some aliases defined by default&#8230;I just think module authors need to take it easy and stick to the most useful and most frequent commands for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Essential PowerShell: To alias, or not to alias, that is the question by Building Binary PowerShell Modules &#8211; Part 2 &#8211; Design Principles and Other Guidelines &#124; Adam Driscoll&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/05/essential-powershell-to-alias-or-not-to-alias-that-is-the-question/#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Building Binary PowerShell Modules &#8211; Part 2 &#8211; Design Principles and Other Guidelines &#124; Adam Driscoll&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=738#comment-2767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] it is helpful. There is some discussion as to whether this is best practice. I recommend reading Kirk Munro&#8217;s post on the topic. Always make sure that another alias does not conflict with the one you are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it is helpful. There is some discussion as to whether this is best practice. I recommend reading Kirk Munro&#8217;s post on the topic. Always make sure that another alias does not conflict with the one you are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Essential PowerShell: To alias, or not to alias, that is the question by Mark E. Schill</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/05/essential-powershell-to-alias-or-not-to-alias-that-is-the-question/#comment-2765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark E. Schill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=738#comment-2765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that vendors should create aliases at all. Aliases are shortcuts that makes commands more accessible by not requiring you to type long names for frequently used commands.  They should never be in published scripts and they should never be used in examples. 

The builtin aliases are ok in my opinion because they do serve as a way to ease the transition for users to PowerShell, e.x. dir or cd.

Let the user decide what they want shortened and create their own aliases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that vendors should create aliases at all. Aliases are shortcuts that makes commands more accessible by not requiring you to type long names for frequently used commands.  They should never be in published scripts and they should never be used in examples. </p>
<p>The builtin aliases are ok in my opinion because they do serve as a way to ease the transition for users to PowerShell, e.x. dir or cd.</p>
<p>Let the user decide what they want shortened and create their own aliases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Essential PowerShell: To alias, or not to alias, that is the question by When Import-Module Does Not &#171; Use PowerShell</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/05/essential-powershell-to-alias-or-not-to-alias-that-is-the-question/#comment-2764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[When Import-Module Does Not &#171; Use PowerShell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=738#comment-2764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] question came up about the behavior of Import-Module (in the context of this interesting discussion of whether module authors should provide aliases), especially with Version 3 and the auto-loading of modules (what’s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] question came up about the behavior of Import-Module (in the context of this interesting discussion of whether module authors should provide aliases), especially with Version 3 and the auto-loading of modules (what’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Essential PowerShell: To alias, or not to alias, that is the question by Kirk Munro</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/05/essential-powershell-to-alias-or-not-to-alias-that-is-the-question/#comment-2761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirk Munro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=738#comment-2761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You could alternatively include a function in your module to explicitly define the aliases on demand.  Still, I think aliases should be used at a minimum, for the most frequent use cases only.

I&#039;d be interested in seeing usage counts that show how frequently the core aliases are used.  Obviously the domain-specific ones are used the most, but others I suspect are hardly used at all, in which case why have aliases for those at all?  You can tell by the core aliases that some were created simply because the developer and tester working on that set of commands wanted to have aliases for their simplified use, even when they aren&#039;t really necessary in the real world (like the *-Alias commands -- who needs aliases for Import-Alias and Export-Alias?  I&#039;d wager those aliases are hardly used at all.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could alternatively include a function in your module to explicitly define the aliases on demand.  Still, I think aliases should be used at a minimum, for the most frequent use cases only.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in seeing usage counts that show how frequently the core aliases are used.  Obviously the domain-specific ones are used the most, but others I suspect are hardly used at all, in which case why have aliases for those at all?  You can tell by the core aliases that some were created simply because the developer and tester working on that set of commands wanted to have aliases for their simplified use, even when they aren&#8217;t really necessary in the real world (like the *-Alias commands &#8212; who needs aliases for Import-Alias and Export-Alias?  I&#8217;d wager those aliases are hardly used at all.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Essential PowerShell: To alias, or not to alias, that is the question by Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/05/essential-powershell-to-alias-or-not-to-alias-that-is-the-question/#comment-2759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel "Jaykul" Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=738#comment-2759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s too bad there&#039;s not a way to generate aliases without exporting them unless the user asks for them. There&#039;s an -Alias parameter on Import-Module, but it&#039;s purpose is to OVERRIDE the aliases that the module attempts to export, rather than overriding the aliases that the module does NOT attempt to export.

One additional possibility though, is to ship whatever aliases you like, but wrapped  in code such that the user has to explicitly opt-in to exporting them:

Import-Module ModuleName -Argument ExportAliases]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too bad there&#8217;s not a way to generate aliases without exporting them unless the user asks for them. There&#8217;s an -Alias parameter on Import-Module, but it&#8217;s purpose is to OVERRIDE the aliases that the module attempts to export, rather than overriding the aliases that the module does NOT attempt to export.</p>
<p>One additional possibility though, is to ship whatever aliases you like, but wrapped  in code such that the user has to explicitly opt-in to exporting them:</p>
<p>Import-Module ModuleName -Argument ExportAliases</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerShell MVP for 2012 by Dave Carnahan</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/04/powershell-mvp-for-2012/#comment-2757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Carnahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 01:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-2757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kirk, 
I just hope you don&#039;t slow down (just yet). 
You (especially you) and the community have done some very good things for PowerShell - and the IT industry as a whole. 
Some things people won&#039;t realize for months from now. Peace be with you - and the rest of your comrades.

Dave C.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirk,<br />
I just hope you don&#8217;t slow down (just yet).<br />
You (especially you) and the community have done some very good things for PowerShell &#8211; and the IT industry as a whole.<br />
Some things people won&#8217;t realize for months from now. Peace be with you &#8211; and the rest of your comrades.</p>
<p>Dave C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerShell MVP for 2012 by Will Steele</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/04/powershell-mvp-for-2012/#comment-2755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Steele]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-2755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congrats. I know I appreciate your work; it has saved me tons of time more than once.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats. I know I appreciate your work; it has saved me tons of time more than once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerShell MVP for 2012 by Arthur (@ArthurZ)</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/04/powershell-mvp-for-2012/#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur (@ArthurZ)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-2754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations!! Keep posting the awesome stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations!! Keep posting the awesome stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerShell MVP for 2012 by fakherhalim</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2012/01/04/powershell-mvp-for-2012/#comment-2753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fakherhalim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-2753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations, Kirk -- you really deserved that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Kirk &#8212; you really deserved that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Essential PowerShell: Understanding foreach by PowerShell: Return, ForEach,ForEach-Object and a pipe &#124; jbmurphy.com</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2007/08/21/essential-powershell-understanding-foreach/#comment-2724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PowerShell: Return, ForEach,ForEach-Object and a pipe &#124; jbmurphy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/2007/08/21/essential-powershell-understanding-foreach/#comment-2724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] led me to this page, and specifically this quote clears it up for me (kinda):  . . . [the object] it is sent into the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] led me to this page, and specifically this quote clears it up for me (kinda):  . . . [the object] it is sent into the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerShell Quick Tip: Creating wide tables with PowerShell by Powershell, Wie was und wo &#124; Mathias Jäkel ist Online</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2010/11/11/powershell-quick-tip-creating-wide-tables-with-powershell/#comment-2688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Powershell, Wie was und wo &#124; Mathias Jäkel ist Online]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/2010/11/11/powershell-quick-tip-creating-wide-tables-with-powershell/#comment-2688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] PowerShell Quick Tip: Creating wide tables with PowerShell « Poshoholic [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PowerShell Quick Tip: Creating wide tables with PowerShell « Poshoholic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerSE 2.5.3 is now available by Kirk Munro</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2011/10/14/powerse-2-5-3-is-now-available/#comment-2679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirk Munro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/2011/10/14/powerse-2-5-3-is-now-available/#comment-2679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Phil!  Glad you like it!

Regarding the version check, we will probably make it easier in future releases, but for now you can check the version of the installer exe (which is signed and has a version number), or you can simply invoke $host.Version from the embedded PowerShell console inside PowerSE or PowerWF.

If you have other questions or suggestions, don&#039;t hesitate to share them!

Thanks,

Kirk out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil!  Glad you like it!</p>
<p>Regarding the version check, we will probably make it easier in future releases, but for now you can check the version of the installer exe (which is signed and has a version number), or you can simply invoke $host.Version from the embedded PowerShell console inside PowerSE or PowerWF.</p>
<p>If you have other questions or suggestions, don&#8217;t hesitate to share them!</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Kirk out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerSE 2.5.3 is now available by philiplavoie</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2011/10/14/powerse-2-5-3-is-now-available/#comment-2678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[philiplavoie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/2011/10/14/powerse-2-5-3-is-now-available/#comment-2678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Kirk!

Love this IDE and so glad you are on the squad.

Quick question that&#039;s always bugged me about it tho...How can I confirm that I&#039;ve installed the latest version? There&#039;s no help/about and the .exe doesn&#039;t have a version on it either.

Thanks in advance sir!
-phil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kirk!</p>
<p>Love this IDE and so glad you are on the squad.</p>
<p>Quick question that&#8217;s always bugged me about it tho&#8230;How can I confirm that I&#8217;ve installed the latest version? There&#8217;s no help/about and the .exe doesn&#8217;t have a version on it either.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance sir!<br />
-phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerSE 2.5.3 is now available by Kirk Munro</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2011/10/14/powerse-2-5-3-is-now-available/#comment-2677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirk Munro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/2011/10/14/powerse-2-5-3-is-now-available/#comment-2677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks John, glad you&#039;re enjoying it!  You know your feedback is always welcome and appreciated! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks John, glad you&#8217;re enjoying it!  You know your feedback is always welcome and appreciated! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PowerSE 2.5.3 is now available by jkavanagh58</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2011/10/14/powerse-2-5-3-is-now-available/#comment-2676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkavanagh58]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/2011/10/14/powerse-2-5-3-is-now-available/#comment-2676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great stuff.  I have started using PowerSE and really liking it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff.  I have started using PowerSE and really liking it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seasons of change: new Product Manager for PowerWF&#8482; and PowerSE at Devfarm Software by Alfredo Hickman</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2011/09/06/seasons-of-change-new-product-manager-for-powerwf-and-powerse-at-devfarm-software/#comment-2658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alfredo Hickman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/2011/09/06/seasons-of-change-new-product-manager-for-powerwf-and-powerse-at-devfarm-software/#comment-2658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad you are doing well. Keep up the good work man.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you are doing well. Keep up the good work man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A letter of apology to the VMware PowerPack community by Maybe VMware Needs a Quality Oversight Department&#8230; &#124; Tech-Tap</title>
		<link>http://poshoholic.com/2010/12/17/a-letter-of-apology-to-the-vmware-powerpack-community/#comment-2656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maybe VMware Needs a Quality Oversight Department&#8230; &#124; Tech-Tap]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://kirkmunro.wordpress.com/2010/12/17/a-letter-of-apology-to-the-vmware-powerpack-community/#comment-2656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I am presenting at an upcoming PAVMUG session about vSphere remote management when I came across an apology by one of the PowerGUI guys. Essentially, he was apologizing for something that VMware changed in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am presenting at an upcoming PAVMUG session about vSphere remote management when I came across an apology by one of the PowerGUI guys. Essentially, he was apologizing for something that VMware changed in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
